Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Study of Autologous Pericardium Patch and Pulmonary Patch for Treating the Infants With Aortic Coarctation Combining Hypoplastic Aortic Arch / 中国循环杂志
Chinese Circulation Journal ; (12): 280-284, 2016.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-484463
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To compare the effects of pericardium patch aortoplasty and pulmonary patch aortoplasty for treating the infants with aorticcoarctation (AC) combining hypoplastic aortic arch in order to provide a better surgical choice in clinical practice.

Methods:

A total of 57 patients with AC combining hypoplastic aortic arch treated in our hospital from 2009-01 to 2014-12 were retrospectively studied. The patients were divided into 2 groups Pericardium patch aortoplasty group,n=26 and Pulmonary patch aortoplasty group,n=31. The changes of the pressure gradient at post-operation and follow-up period were compared.

Results:

There were 2/57 (3.5%) patients died, 1 in Pericardium patch aortoplasty group by pulmonary hypertension crisis, the other 1 in Pulmonary patch aortoplasty group by respiratory distress syndrome. No renal failure or neurological complication occurred in neither groups. The cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic clamping time, ventilator time and ICU stay time were similar between 2 groups,P>0.05. Selective cerebral perfusion time in Pericardium patch aortoplasty group was shorter than Pulmonary patch aortoplasty group (30.5 ± 8.6) s vs (35.6 ± 10.3) s,P0.05. Follow-up study was conducted in 51 patients for (17.6 ± 16.6) months, Pericardium patch aortoplasty group had 6 patients with re-stenosis, 3 of them would receive balloon angioplasty and 3 would be continuously followed-up; Pulmonary patch aortoplasty group had 6 patients with re-stenosis, 2 of them ifnished balloon angioplasty and their pressure gradients were obviously decreased, 4 would be continuously followed-up. Kaplan-Meier curves presented that Pulmonary patch aortoplasty group was superior to Pericardium patch aortoplasty group in re-stenosis occurrence during follow-up period.

Conclusion:

Both pericardium patch aortoplasty and pulmonary patch aortoplasty were effective for treating the patients with AC combining hypoplastic aortic arch, the early post-operative efifcacy was similar, while the mid-term follow-up result was better in pulmonary patch aortoplasty.

Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Circulation Journal Year: 2016 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Circulation Journal Year: 2016 Document type: Article
...