Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experimental research of shielding the patients during electron beam radiotherapy / 中华放射医学与防护杂志
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-496857
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the shielding effects of 1-4 layers of lead aprons (LPs) and body shielding devices (BSDs) against stray radiation (SR) outside the electron beam field of 6-15 MeV.Methods JR-115B LiF TLDs were used to measure the stray radiation doses (SRDs) to the patient undergoing treatment,before and after being shielding,for different distances,different energies,different applicators,variable layers of LPs,and different thickness of body shielding devices (BSDs),respectively,along long calculating and comparing the shielding ratios of LPs and BSDs against SR.Results When the applicator (10 cm × 10 cm) is unchanged,the shielding ratio increased with the increased distance from measuring point (r =0.717,P < 0.05) and decreased with the increased electron energy (r =-0.678,P < 0.05);when the energy was constant,there was no correlation between the shielding ratio and the size of applicator (P > 0.05);For lower energy electron beam of 6 and 9 MeV,the shielding ratio for 1 mm Pb-BSD was slightly higher than that for 2 layers of LA (t =2.519,2 662,P < 0.05),ranging from 81.5% to 95.3% and 55.4% to 84.6%,respectively.For 12 and 15 MeV higher energy electron beam,the shielding ratio for 2 mm Pb-BSD was slightly higher than that for 4 layers of LA (t=3.768,7.934,P<0.05),ranging from 64.6% to 93.4% and 51.1% to 92.4%,respectively.Conclusions LAs or BSDs are availavle for effectively reducing the doses from stray radiation,and may help reduce the secondary risks from stray radiation.BSDs have more obvious advantages than LPs with regard to shielding effect.

Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection Year: 2016 Document type: Article
Full text: Available Database: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection Year: 2016 Document type: Article
...