A Comparison of Social Capital Tools Developed by International Institutes and Nations / 農村醫學 地域保健
Journal of Agricultural Medicine & Community Health
; : 111-130, 2012.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM (Western Pacific)
| ID: wpr-719839
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to identify and compare social capital measurement tools for the convenient use in public health studies. METHOD ANDRESULT:
This study examined and compared social capital tools developed individually by the World Bank, the OECD, the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Ireland, and Korea. A comprehensive framework was constructed with six conceptual dimensions and sixteen indices. The six dimensions included Membership, Network, Trust, Information and communication, Social and civic participation, and Social cohesion and exclusion, which connoted the structural, cognitive, bonding, bridging, operative, and output elements. The indices of each tool were respectively matched to the indices of the comprehensive framework. The comprehensive tools were Integrated Questionnaire for the Measurement of Social Capital (SC-IQ) of the World Bank with 27 questions and the European Social Survey (ESS) of the OECD with 80 questions.CONCLUSION:
The SC-IQ should be utilized in public health studies due to its simplicity yet comprehensiveness as a social capital tool. The ESS should also be considered as a comprehensive tool.
Full text:
Available
Database:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Australia
/
United Nations
/
United States
/
Canada
/
Public Health
/
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Academies and Institutes
/
United Kingdom
/
Ireland
/
Korea
Type of study:
Prognostic study
Aspects:
Social determinants of health
Country/Region as subject:
North America
/
Asia
/
Europa
/
Oceania
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of Agricultural Medicine & Community Health
Year:
2012
Document type:
Article