Clinical Outcomes of M-Plus Intraocular Lenses
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
; : 519-526, 2014.
Article
in Korean
| WPRIM (Western Pacific)
| ID: wpr-74890
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the clinical outcomes of eyes implanted with a zonal refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with an inferior segmental near add (M-plus), and to compare the outcomes between M-plus and a diffractive-type multifocal IOL, AT LISA (366D, bifocal).METHODS:
We reviewed 19 eyes from 10 patients who were implanted with M-plus and 52 eyes of 26 patients who were implanted with AT LISA. The clinical outcomes of these 2 intraocular lenses were evaluated at 1 day and 2 months postoperatively, and consisted of distant, intermediate, and near visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, degree of tilt, and decentration using anterior segment photography, depth of focus, and patient satisfaction.RESULTS:
There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups with respect to distant vision, near vision, refractive error, contrast sensitivity, degree of tilt, decentration, or satisfaction score. The M-plus group demonstrated significantly better intermediate visual acuity. In the defocus curve, the M-plus group also demonstrated significantly better visual acuities for intermediate unfocused vision levels.CONCLUSIONS:
The M-plus multifocal IOLs are able to provide satisfactory distant and near visual acuity and visual function. The M-plus multifocal IOLs provide better intermediate vision than the AT LISA.
Full text:
Available
Database:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Main subject:
Refractive Errors
/
Photography
/
Contrast Sensitivity
/
Visual Acuity
/
Fluconazole
/
Patient Satisfaction
/
Lenses, Intraocular
Limits:
Humans
Language:
Korean
Journal:
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society
Year:
2014
Document type:
Article