The diagnostic performance of version 2018 LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI / 中华放射学杂志
Chinese Journal of Radiology
; (12): 1060-1064, 2019.
Article
in Chinese
| WPRIM (Western Pacific)
| ID: wpr-800174
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the diagnostic performance of the most recent 2018 version of liver reporting and data system (LI-RADS) on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced MRI to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients.@*Methods@#From July 2015 to September 2018, 130 consecutive high-risk patients with 134 focal liver lesions were retrospectively enrolled in our center and underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and subsequent hepatectomy within 1 month. Two independent radiologists blindly reviewed the preoperative MR images of all patients, and determined the presence of major features, ancillary features and the LI-RADS categories according to the version 2018 LI-RADS of each liver observation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, Youden index and accuracy of the 2018 version of LI-RADS were evaluated with postoperative histopathological results as references. The inter-observer agreement between the two radiologists was tested by Kappa analysis.@*Results@#The Kappa value of the LI-RADS categories between two radiologists was 0.628 (95%CI 0.565 to 0.691). The sensitivity, specificity, Youden index values and accuracy of LR-5 by the two reviewers were 80.4% (78/97), 87.6% (85/97); 75.7% (28/37), 73.0% (27/37); 0.560 8, 0.605 9; 79.1% (106/134), 83.6% (112/136), respectively. These measures of LR-4+LR-5 were 91.8% (85/97), 96.9% (94/97); 67.6% (25/37), 67.6% (25/37); 0.605 9, 0.644 6; 82.1% (110/134), 88.8% (119/134), respectively.@*Conclusion@#Version 2018 LI-RADS demonstrated high sensitivity and accuracy to diagnosis HCC in high-risk patients on Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI.
Full text:
Available
Database:
WPRIM (Western Pacific)
Type of study:
Diagnostic study
/
Prognostic study
Language:
Chinese
Journal:
Chinese Journal of Radiology
Year:
2019
Document type:
Article