Two-part and Three-part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus Treated with the Polarus Interlocking Nail: A Comparison of Fracture Types

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures (two-part and three-part) treated with the Polarus interlocking nail, comparing their fractures types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 22 patients with displaced proximal humerus fractures. There were 10 surgical neck (SN) and 1 anatomical neck (AN) two-part fractures and 10 greater tuberosity/surgical neck (GT/SN) and 1 GT/AN three-part fractures. All patients were surgically treated solely with the Polarus interlocking nail using a closed technique. Functional assessment was obtained using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, which grade outcomes as excellent (>75), satisfactory (50~75), poor (0.05). CONCLUSION: Both displaced two-part fractures and three-part GT/SN fractures can have above satisfactory functional and radiographic outcomes with the Polarus interlocking nail using a closed technique. Even though displaced three-part GT/SN fractures in elderly osteopenic patients (>60 years), we treated successfully with the Polarus interlocking nail.