Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical behavior of overdentures supported by different implant position and angulation using Micro ERA® system: a finite element analysis study
Ferreira, Felipe Franco; Borges, Guilherme Almeida; Silva, Letícia Del Rio; Velôso, Daniele Valente; Barbin, Thaís; Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz.
Afiliación
  • Ferreira, Felipe Franco; São Leopoldo Mandic and Dental Research Center. Department of Prosthodontics. Campinas. BR
  • Borges, Guilherme Almeida; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Silva, Letícia Del Rio; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Velôso, Daniele Valente; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Barbin, Thaís; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
  • Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz; University of Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. j. oral sci ; 18: e191667, jan.-dez. 2019. ilus
Article en En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1095342
Biblioteca responsable: BR218.1
ABSTRACT

Aim:

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical behavior of implant-retained mandibular overdentures using Micro ERA® system with different implant position and angulation by finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods:

Four 3D finite element models of simplified mandibular overdentures were constructed, using one Bränemark implant with a Micro ERA® attachment. The implant was positioned on the canine or lateral incisor area with an angulation of either 0º (C-0º; LI-0º) or 17º (C-17º, LI-17º) to the vertical axis. A 100 N axial load was applied in one side simultaneously, from first premolar to second molar. In all models it was analyzed the overdenture displacement, compressive/tensile stress in the bone-implant interface, and also the von Mises equivalent stress for the nylon component of the housing. The stresses were obtained (numerically and color-coded) for further comparison among all the groups.

Results:

The displacement on the overdenture was higher at the posterior surface for all groups, especially in the C-17º group. When comparing the compressive/tensile stress in the bone-implant interface, the lateral-incisor groups (LI-0º and LI-17º) had the highest compressive and lowest tensile stress compared to the canine groups (C-0º and C-17º). The von Mises stress on the nylon component generated higher stress value for the LI-0º among all groups.

Conclusions:

The inclination and positioning of the implant in mandibular overdenture interferes directly in the stress distribution. The results showed that angulated implants had the highest displacement. While the implants placed in the lateral incisor position presented lower compressive and higher tensile stress respectively. For the attachment the canine groups had the lowest stress
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: BBO / LILACS Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Análisis de Elementos Finitos / Prótesis de Recubrimiento Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: BBO / LILACS Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Análisis de Elementos Finitos / Prótesis de Recubrimiento Idioma: En Revista: Braz. j. oral sci Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil