Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Conflicts of Financial Interest in Publications on the Consumption of High-Intensity Sweeteners and Body-Weight Changes: A Systematic Review
Lima, Rebeca Cirilo de; Silva, Gabriela Bioni e; Mendonça, Vanessa Souza; Malhão, Thainá Alves; Diogenes, Maria Eduarda Leão; Huguenin, Grazielle Vilas Bôas.
Afiliación
  • Lima, Rebeca Cirilo de; National Institute of Cardiology. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Silva, Gabriela Bioni e; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Mendonça, Vanessa Souza; Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Malhão, Thainá Alves; National Cancer Institute (INCA). Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Diogenes, Maria Eduarda Leão; National Cancer Institute (INCA). Fluminense Federal University. Rio de Janeiro. BR
  • Huguenin, Grazielle Vilas Bôas; National Institute of Cardiology. Rio de Janeiro. BR
Nutrition Reviews ; Sept. 3, 2024.
Article en En | Inca | ID: biblio-1570791
Biblioteca responsable: BR440.1
ABSTRACT
Context Diseases related to excessive sugar consumption have become a public health concern. However, there may be a direct association between the consumption of artificial sweeteners and changes in body weight.

Objective:

The aim was to evaluate potential industry financial conflicts of interest in publications on the relationship between high-intensity sweetener consumption and changes in body weight in observational and intervention studies. Data Sources The systematic review used the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and the VHL (Virtual Health Library) Regional Portal, including the LILACS databases. The PICOS strategy were used in the search strategy for intervention studies and for observational studies used the exposure factor as the criterion. Data Extraction Inclusion criteria were observational and intervention studies in adults, without population or health status restrictions, without restriction on the year of publication, but restricted to full articles in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Exclusion criteria were humans younger than 18 years, cross-sectional studies, and animal and in vitro studies. Data

Analysis:

There were extracted effect estimates, odds ratios, and linear associations, quantifying the effects per unit of intake of high-intensity sweeteners. The risk of bias in the intervention studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool (RoB). The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for observational studies (case-control and cohort).

Conclusion:

Most clinical trials favor using artificial sweeteners and receive contributions from the food industry. Observational studies, for the most part, show that the use of artificial sweeteners is unfavorable. In these studies, there was no sponsorship from the food industry, only from regulatory bodies. This result suggests that studies that had the support of the food industry had their influence on their

outcomes:

Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: Inca Asunto principal: Edulcorantes / Peso Corporal Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Nutrition Reviews Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de datos: Inca Asunto principal: Edulcorantes / Peso Corporal Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Nutrition Reviews Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article