Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Anaphylaxis at school. Are we prepared? Could we improve?
Rodríguez Ferran, L; Gómez Tornero, N; Cortés Álvarez, N; Thorndike Piedra, F.
Afiliación
  • Rodríguez Ferran, L; Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa. Departament of Paediatrics. Paediatric Allergy Unit. Spain
  • Gómez Tornero, N; Rambla Primary Care Centre. Department of Paediatrics. Terrassa. Spain
  • Cortés Álvarez, N; Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa. Departament of Paediatrics. Paediatric Allergy Unit. Spain
  • Thorndike Piedra, F; Hospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa. Departament of Paediatrics. Paediatric Allergy Unit. Spain
Allergol. immunopatol ; 48(4): 384-389, jul.-ago. 2020. tab, graf
Article en En | IBECS | ID: ibc-199724
Biblioteca responsable: ES1.1
Ubicación: BNCS
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Food allergy is a highly prevalent disorder. Anaphylaxis is the most serious consequence, and reactions often occur in schools. In the event of anaphylactic reaction prompt treatment is key and should be initiated by school personnel. The aim of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of the management of anaphylaxis, and to determine if it improves after a training session among school staff. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive study carried out by means of a pre-and post-training questionnaire completed by participants before and after a training session held at the school. Data from the same participants before and after the educational session were compared using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Three schools were enrolled (with a total of 38 children with food allergy) and 53 participants (85% teachers, 15% canteen staff) were trained. In the pre-training surveys, 83% said they had a Student's Allergic Reaction Management Plan, 56% had met with parents, 83% recognised some symptoms of allergic reaction but only 41% recognised anaphylaxis, 16% knew when to use adrenaline, 15% knew how to use it and 19% knew how to act after administering it. In the post-training questionnaires, 100% were satisfied and believed they had improved their knowledge, 93% recognised anaphylaxis and 95% the treatment of choice. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the intervention their knowledge was insufficient, but it improved considerably after simple training. It also increased the confidence of the staff, which will be decisive when responding to an anaphylactic reaction. We believe that a compulsory training programme should be implemented universally in all schools
RESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Escolar / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos / Anafilaxia Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergol. immunopatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 06-national / ES Base de datos: IBECS Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Escolar / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos / Anafilaxia Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Allergol. immunopatol Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article