[Comparison of mediansternotomy approach vs left thoracotomy approach for distal aortic arch aneurysm, and their postoperative complications].
Kyobu Geka
; 55(2): 140-2, 2002 Feb.
Article
en Ja
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11842552
We performed surgery for distal arch aneurysm in 22 patients; through a mediansternotomy in 11 patients (group M), and through a left thoracotomy approach in 11 patients (group L). If the distal position of an aneurysm was located at the pulmonary hilus without severe calcification of the ascending aorta, the mediansternotomy approach was chosen, whereas if we suspected that distal anastomosis would be difficult due to severe calcification of the descending aorta or aortic dissection type B, the left thoracotomy approach was selected. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time (min.) was 229 +/- 56 in group M and 225 +/- 47 in group L, the mean circulation arrest time (min.) was 39 +/- 19 in group M and 31 +/- 5 in group L, and the mean lowest temperature (degree C) was 22 +/- 1 in group M and 20 +/- 2 in group L. No severe cerebral or cardiac complications developed in any patients. The hospital mortality was 9% (1/11) in group M and 9% (1/11) in group L. Following discharge, 8 (73%) patients from group M and 9 (92%) from group L resumed a normal lifestyle. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups and the operative results of both approaches proved satisfactory. Therefore our indications for each surgical approach to treat distal arch aneurysm seemed appropriate.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Complicaciones Posoperatorias
/
Esternón
/
Toracotomía
/
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica
/
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos
Límite:
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
Ja
Revista:
Kyobu Geka
Año:
2002
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Japón
Pais de publicación:
Japón