Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Safe gametes acquisition through association of seminal processing techniques with HIV serodiscordant couples]. / Obtenção de gametas seguros por meio de associação de técnicas de processamento seminal para casais sorodiscordantes para HIV.
Queiroz, Priscila; Tanil, Claudia Taddeo; Madaschi, Camila; Lopes, Debora Rodrigues; Iaconelli Junior, Assumpto; Pasqualotto, Fabio Firmbach; Borges Junior, Edson.
Afiliación
  • Queiroz P; Laboratório de Andrologia e Fertilização in vitro, Fertility-Centro de Fertilização Assistida, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet ; 30(4): 171-6, 2008 Apr.
Article en Pt | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19142488
PURPOSE: the propose of this study was to analyze the clinical and laboratorial parameters of patients submitted to human assisted reproduction techniques with association of sperm processing techniques, in order to remove virus particles from semen samples of couples in which men was infected by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: assessed were 11 intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles from couples whose men were HIV seropositive (HIV Group), and 35 cycles in which semen donors' samples were used in ICSI procedures (Control Group). Semen samples from Control Group were submitted to routine semen analysis, sperm wash and cryopreservation. The man from HIV Group received previous antibiotic therapy; the semen samples were analyzed routinely and prepared by sperm wash and density gradient method before cryopreservation. Those samples were evaluated to viral load and ICSI was performed when no HIV was detected. RESULTS: with regards to semen analysis, the groups were similar to sperm concentration and progressive motility. Nevertheless, the percentage of sperm with normal morphology were higher on Control Group (14.3%) than HIV (5.8%; p=0.002). On embryo parameters assessment, the normal fertilization (CT: 74.7% and HIV: 71.7; p=0.838, respectively) and good embryos rate (CT: 42.4% and HIV: 65.1%; p=0.312, respectively) were comparable. On the other hand, the Control Group presented better clinic results than HIV Group (ongoing pregnancy rate: 52.9% versus 12.5%; p=0.054, and implantation rate: 42.6 versus 10.4%; p=0.059, respectively), however the differences were not statistically significant. After delivery, no seroconversion was observed on mother and child. CONCLUSIONS: the association of sperm processing techniques in order to remove HIV from semen samples does not influence in laboratorial parameters of assisted reproduction techniques cycles. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated excellent results getting safety gametes to serodiscordant couples.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semen / Seropositividad para VIH / Seronegatividad para VIH / Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Pt Revista: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Semen / Seropositividad para VIH / Seronegatividad para VIH / Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: Pt Revista: Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2008 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Brasil