Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Costs of pregabalin or gabapentin for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Udall, Margarita; Harnett, James; Mardekian, Jack.
Afiliación
  • Udall M; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY 10017, USA. margarita.udall@pfizer.com
J Med Econ ; 15(2): 361-70, 2012.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22181052
OBJECTIVE: To characterize and compare healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) newly prescribed pregabalin or gabapentin in a real-world clinical setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Databases (2007-2009). METHODS: Patients with new prescriptions for pregabalin or gabapentin (index event) in 2008 and ≥1 healthcare encounter with an ICD-9 code for pDPN (250.6 or 357.2) within 30 days prior to the first prescription were identified and propensity score matched; continuous enrollment 12 months pre- and post-index was required. Pre- to post-index changes in 12-month all-cause and pDPN-attributable resource utilization and costs were compared between pregabalin and gabapentin using a difference-in-difference (DID) approach. RESULTS: A total of 910 pregabalin patients (48.6% female; mean age 63.3 ± 12.1 years) were matched with 910 gabapentin patients (48.8% female; mean age 63.3 ± 12.1 years). The DID showed no significant differences between cohorts for pre- to post-index changes in any of the all-cause resource utilization categories. While prescription costs increased significantly more with pregabalin (DID -$563; p < 0.0001), the DID of $1603 for total healthcare costs per patient indicated that the pre- to post-index increases of $3081 for pregabalin and $4684 for gabapentin patients were comparable (p = 0.8474). Total pDPN-attributable healthcare costs were significantly higher with pregabalin (DID -$385; p < 0.0001), resulting from higher prescription costs (DID -$432; p < 0.0001). Limitations of this study include the inability to specifically link pDPN with medication prescribing; differences between groups despite propensity score matching; use of proxy measures for adherence parameters; and inability to capture efficacy outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients initiating pregabalin or gabapentin, there were no significant differences between the drugs in the pre- to post-index changes in all-cause total healthcare costs, despite the increase in prescription costs for pregabalin.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos / Nefropatías Diabéticas / Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico / Aminas / Analgésicos Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dolor / Ácidos Ciclohexanocarboxílicos / Nefropatías Diabéticas / Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico / Aminas / Analgésicos Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Med Econ Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido