Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bile duct evaluation of potential living liver donors with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography: Single-dose, double dose or half-dose contrast enhanced imaging.
Kinner, Sonja; Steinweg, Verena; Maderwald, Stefan; Radtke, Arnold; Sotiropoulos, Georgios; Forsting, Michael; Schroeder, Tobias.
Afiliación
  • Kinner S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany. Electronic address: Sonja.Kinner@uni-due.de.
  • Steinweg V; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Maderwald S; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany; Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany.
  • Radtke A; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Sotiropoulos G; Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Forsting M; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
  • Schroeder T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.
Eur J Radiol ; 83(5): 763-7, 2014 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24637070
INTRODUCTION: Detailed knowledge of the biliary anatomy is essential to avoid complications in living donor liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dosage of Gd-EOB-DTPA for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (ce-MRC) with reference to contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography (ce-CTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 potential living liver donors (PLLD) underwent both ce-CTC and ce-MRC. Ten candidates each received single, double or half-dose Gd-EOB-DTPA. Ce-MRC images with and without inversion recovery pulses (T1w±IR) were acquired 20-30min after intravenous contrast injection. Image data was quantitatively and qualitatively reviewed by two radiologists based on a on a 5-point scale. Data sets were compared using a Mann-Whitney-U-test or Wilcoxon-rank-sum-test. Kappa values were also calculated. RESULTS: All image series provided sufficient diagnostic information both showing normal biliary anatomy and variant bile ducts. Ce-CTC showed statistically significant better results compared to all ce-MRC data sets. T1w MRC with single dose Gd-EOB-DTPA proved to be superior to half and double dose in subjective and objective evaluation without a statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Ce-MRC is at any dosage inferior to ce-CTC. As far as preoperative planning of bile duct surgery is focused on the central biliary anatomy, ce-MRC can replace harmful ce-CTC strategies, anyway. Best results were seen with single dose GD-EOB-DTPA on T1w MRC+IR.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductos Biliares / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Trasplante de Hígado / Donadores Vivos / Gadolinio DTPA Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Conductos Biliares / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Trasplante de Hígado / Donadores Vivos / Gadolinio DTPA Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Radiol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Irlanda