Thromboprophylaxis in myeloma: what is happening outside of clinical trials?
Ir Med J
; 107(9): 281-4, 2014 Oct.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25417387
Patients with myeloma are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). There is no consensus about what agent to use or what haematologists are doing in clinical practice. A survey was sent to haematologists treating patients with myeloma in Ireland. 32/45 (71%) responded. 13/28 (46%) felt that VTE affected < 5% of patients. However, 8/28 (29%) felt it affected 10-19%. Thromboprophylaxis was most commonly used in patients on lenalidomide; 25/28 (89%) and thalidomide; 23/28 (82%). 23/28 (82%) used LMWH and 20/28 (71%) used aspirin either very frequently or frequently. 3/28 (11%) had used dabigatran/rivaroxaban despite there being little evidence to support their use. Efficacy was the most important factor in choosing an agent for 25/28 (89%). Bleeding was not felt to be an issue 15/29 (52%) were not using thromboprophylaxis guidelines. This survey demonstrated wide variation in the beliefs and practices regarding the burden of VTE in patients with myeloma and the need for thromboprophylaxis.
Buscar en Google
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Servicios Preventivos de Salud
/
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina
/
Tromboembolia Venosa
/
Fármacos Hematológicos
/
Mieloma Múltiple
Tipo de estudio:
Etiology_studies
/
Guideline
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Aspecto:
Patient_preference
Límite:
Humans
País/Región como asunto:
Europa
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ir Med J
Año:
2014
Tipo del documento:
Article
Pais de publicación:
Irlanda