Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceived barriers and benefits to physical activity in colorectal cancer patients.
Fisher, Abigail; Wardle, J; Beeken, R J; Croker, H; Williams, K; Grimmett, C.
Afiliación
  • Fisher A; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. abigail.fisher@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Wardle J; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, S017 1BJ, UK. abigail.fisher@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Beeken RJ; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Croker H; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Williams K; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
  • Grimmett C; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Support Care Cancer ; 24(2): 903-910, 2016 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26268781
PURPOSE: There is emerging evidence for the benefits of physical activity (PA) post-diagnosis for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. However, population studies suggest activity levels in these patients are very low. Understanding perceived barriers and benefits to activity is a crucial step in designing effective interventions. METHODS: Patients who were between 6 months and 5 years post-diagnosis with non-metastasised disease were identified from five London (UK) hospitals. Four hundred and ninety five completed a lifestyle survey that included open-ended questions on their perceived barriers (what things would stop you from doing more physical activity?) and benefits (what do you think you would gain from doing more physical activity?). Patients also recorded their activity levels using the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, along with sociodemographic and treatment variables. RESULTS: The most commonly reported barriers related to cancer and its treatments (e.g. fatigue). Age and mobility-related comorbidities (e.g. impaired mobility) were also frequently cited. Those who reported age and mobility as barriers, or reported any barrier, were significantly less active even after adjustment for multiple confounders. The most frequently reported benefits were physiological (e.g. improving health and fitness). Cancer-related benefits (such as prevention of recurrence) were rarely reported. Those perceiving physiological benefits or perceiving any benefits were more active in unadjusted models, but associations were not significant in adjusted models. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified important barriers and facilitators in CRC survivors that will aid in the design of theory-based PA interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Ejercicio Físico / Fatiga / Náusea Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Colorrectales / Ejercicio Físico / Fatiga / Náusea Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Alemania