Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Arezzo, A; Passera, R; Forcignanò, E; Rapetti, L; Cirocchi, R; Morino, M.
Afiliación
  • Arezzo A; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. alberto.arezzo@unito.it.
  • Passera R; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
  • Forcignanò E; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
  • Rapetti L; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
  • Cirocchi R; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
  • Morino M; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Surg Endosc ; 32(9): 3739-3753, 2018 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29523982
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) has gained popularity, although it is not evident if benefits of this procedure overcome the potential increased risk. Aim of the study is to compare the outcome of SLC with conventional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC) in a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials only. METHODS: A systematic Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials literature search of articles on SLC and MLC for any indication was performed in June 2017. The main outcomes measured were overall adverse events, pain score (VAS), cosmetic results, quality of life, and incisional hernias. Linear regression was used to model the effect of each procedure on the different outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-six trials were included and data from 5141 participants were analysed; 2444 underwent SLC and 2697 MLC, respectively. Mortality reported was nil in both treatment groups. Overall adverse events were higher in the SLC group (RR 1.41; p < 0.001) compared to MLC group, as well severe adverse events (RR 2.06; p < 0.001) and even mild adverse events (RR 1.23; p = 0.041). This was confirmed also when only trials including 4-port techniques (RR 1.37, p = 0.004) or 3-port techniques were considered (RR 1.89, p = 0.020). The pain score showed a standardized mean difference (SMD) of - 0.36 (p < 0.001) in favour of SLC. Cosmetic outcome by time point scored a SMD of 1.49 (p < 0.001) in favour of SLC. Incisional hernias occurred more frequently (RR 2.97, p = 0.005) in the SLC group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite SLC offers a better cosmetic outcome and reduction of pain, the consistent higher rate of adverse events, both severe and mild, together with the higher rate of incisional hernias, should suggest to reconsider the application of single incision techniques when performing cholecystectomy with the existing technology.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Colecistectomía Laparoscópica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia Pais de publicación: Alemania