Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Environmental assessment of alternative treatment schemes for energy and nutrient recovery from livestock manure.
Pedizzi, C; Noya, I; Sarli, J; González-García, S; Lema, J M; Moreira, M T; Carballa, M.
Afiliación
  • Pedizzi C; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Noya I; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Sarli J; Ahidra, Agua y Energía S.L., Sentmenat, 159, 1°1ª, Camí de Polinyà a Gallecs, 08213 Polinyà, Barcelona, Spain.
  • González-García S; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Lema JM; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Moreira MT; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain.
  • Carballa M; Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain. Electronic address: marta.carballa@usc.es.
Waste Manag ; 77: 276-286, 2018 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685601
The application of livestock manure on agricultural land is being restricted due to its significant content of phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N), leading to eutrophication. At the same time, the growing demand for N and P mineral fertilizers is increasing their production costs and causing the depletion of natural phosphate rock deposits. In the present work, seven technologically feasible treatment schemes for energy (biogas) and nutrient recovery (e.g., struvite precipitation) and/or removal (e.g., partial nitritation/anammox) were evaluated from an environmental perspective. In general, while approaches based solely on energy recovery and use of digestate as fertilizer are commonly limited by community regulations, strategies pursuing the generation of high-quality struvite are not environmentally sound alternatives. In contrast, schemes that include further solid/liquid separation of the digestate improved the environmental profile, and their combination with an additional N-removal stage would lead to the most environmental-friendly framework. However, the preferred scenario was identified to be highly dependent on the particular conditions of each site, integrating environmental, social and economic criteria.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fósforo / Fertilizantes / Estiércol / Nitrógeno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Waste Manag Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fósforo / Fertilizantes / Estiércol / Nitrógeno Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Waste Manag Asunto de la revista: SAUDE AMBIENTAL / TOXICOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos