Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 3-biological side-effects of treatment.
El-Angbawi, Ahmed M; Yassir, Yassir A; McIntyre, Grant T; Revie, Gavin F; Bearn, David R.
Afiliación
  • El-Angbawi AM; Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.
  • Yassir YA; Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.
  • McIntyre GT; Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Revie GF; Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.
  • Bearn DR; Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.
Eur J Orthod ; 41(2): 154-164, 2019 03 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30007330
OBJECTIVE: To compare orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) and patient perception of pain during orthodontic treatment between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eligible participants aged 12 years or above were allocated to treatment with the 0.018-inch or 0.022-inch slot MBT appliance (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) using block randomization in groups of 10. OIIRR was assessed radiographically using standardized periapical radiographs before and after 9 months from the start of treatment. Patient perception of pain was assessed using a validated patient questionnaire at 6 months from the start of treatment. Parametric tests (t-test) and non-parametric tests (chi-square with Fisher's exact tests and Kruskal-Wallis test) assessed differences between the groups (P < 0.05). The correlation between severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology, history of dental trauma, and pain during treatment was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 187 participants randomized (1:1 ratio), 34 withdrew or were excluded (protocol deviations or poor cooperation). There were 77 patients in the 0.018-inch slot group and 76 patients in the 0.022-inch slot group (overall mean age: 19.1 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the severity of the OIIRR nor patient perception of pain between the two study groups (P = 0.115 and P = 0.08 respectively). The correlation between the severity of OIIRR and abnormal root morphology or history of dental trauma was not statistically significant (P = 0.086 and P = 0.313). Moreover, there was no significant correlation between the severity of OIIRR and pain during treatment (R = 0.045, P = 0.617). LIMITATIONS: It was impossible to blind clinicians or patients to allocation, and oral hygiene and periodontal outcomes were not assessed. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of bracket slot size on the severity of OIIRR and patient perception of pain are not significant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 March 2014, registration number: NCT02080338.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortodoncia Correctiva / Resorción Radicular / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Maloclusión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortodoncia Correctiva / Resorción Radicular / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Maloclusión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido