Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Monitoring Training Load, Well-Being, Heart Rate Variability, and Competitive Performance of a Functional-Fitness Female Athlete: A Case Study.
Tibana, Ramires Alsamir; Sousa, Nuno Manuel Frade de; Prestes, Jonato; Feito, Yuri; Ferreira, Carlos Ernesto; Voltarelli, Fabrício Azevedo.
Afiliación
  • Tibana RA; Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFTM), Cuiabá 78000, MT, Brazil. ramirestibana@gmail.com.
  • Sousa NMF; Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, Faculty Estacio of Vitoria, Vitoria 29010, ES, Brazil. nunosfrade@gmail.com.
  • Prestes J; Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia 04534, DF, Brazil. jonatop@gmail.com.
  • Feito Y; Department of Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA. favoltarelli@cpd.ufmt.br.
  • Ferreira CE; Graduation Program on Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia, Brasilia 04534, DF, Brazil. carlosf@ucb.br.
  • Voltarelli FA; Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFTM), Cuiabá 78000, MT, Brazil. yfeito@kennesaw.edu.
Sports (Basel) ; 7(2)2019 Feb 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744103
The aim of this case study was to quantify the magnitude of internal load, acute/chronic workload ratio (ACWR), well-being perception, and heart rate variability (HRV) following 38 weeks of functional-fitness training in a female elite athlete. The internal load was obtained with session rating perceived exertion (session-RPE) while the ACWR was calculated by dividing the acute workload by the chronic workload (four-week average). Furthermore, HRV measurements were analyzed via a commercially available smartphone (HRV4training) each morning upon waking whilst in a supine position. The magnitude of internal load was: the weekly mean total during the 38 weeks was 2092 ± 861 arbitrary units (AU); during the preparation for the Open 2018 was 1973 ± 711 AU; during the Open 2018 it was 1686 ± 412 AU; and during the preparation for the Regionals was 3174 ± 595 AU. The mean ACWR was 1.1 ± 0.5 and 50% of the weeks were outside of the 'safe zone'. The well-being during the 38 weeks of training was 19.4 ± 2.3 points. There were no correlations between training load variables (weekly training load, monotony, ACWR, and HRV), and recuperation subjective variables (well-being, fatigue, sleep, pain, stress, and mood). This case study showed that the training load can be varied in accordance with preparation for a specific competition and ACWR revealed that 50% of the training weeks were outside of the 'safe zone', however, no injuries were reported by the athlete. The effectiveness and cost of these methods are very practical during real world functional-fitness.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sports (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sports (Basel) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Suiza