Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.
Margo-Dermer, E; Dépelteau, A; Girard, A; Hudon, C.
Afiliación
  • Margo-Dermer E; Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
  • Dépelteau A; École de réadaptation, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
  • Girard A; École des Sciences infirmières, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
  • Hudon C; Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. Electronic address: catherine.hudon@usherbrooke.ca.
Public Health ; 172: 1-7, 2019 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31129474
INTRODUCTION: Frequent users of healthcare services are a small proportion of patients with disproportionately high healthcare usage. A wide array of factors, including psychological distress, leads to frequent use of healthcare services. There is no existing synthesis of research on frequent use and psychological distress in the general population. This scoping review aimed to compare psychological distress between frequent and non-frequent users and to examine the association between psychological distress and frequent use of healthcare services in primary care and emergency department (ED) services. METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the five steps defined by Arksey and O'Malley. A search strategy was developed with an information specialist in five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for articles in English published between 1963 and October 2018. To be included, studies had to be quantitative, have taken place in a primary care or ED setting, have documented frequent use, and have measured psychological distress in patients. Two team members independently gathered the data for each of the included studies. Results were collated, summarized, and reported using narrative synthesis. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Psychological distress in primary care is generally higher in frequent users, and increased psychological distress scores are associated with frequent use. Both studies set in EDs reported noteworthy findings, stating that frequent users reported higher levels of psychological distress and that psychological distress was associated with frequent use. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress is prevalent in frequent users and has a significant association with frequent use. As such, psychological distress should be evaluated by physicians to prevent or reduce frequent use and to identify candidates for interventions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Estrés Psicológico / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Estrés Psicológico / Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá Pais de publicación: Países Bajos