Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on oncological outcomes: a narrative review.
Wall, T; Sherwin, A; Ma, D; Buggy, D J.
Afiliación
  • Wall T; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; EU-COST Action 15204, Euro-Periscope, Avenue Louise 149, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: tom.p.wall@gmail.com.
  • Sherwin A; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; EU-COST Action 15204, Euro-Periscope, Avenue Louise 149, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
  • Ma D; EU-COST Action 15204, Euro-Periscope, Avenue Louise 149, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anaesthesia, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK.
  • Buggy DJ; Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; EU-COST Action 15204, Euro-Periscope, Avenue Louise 149, 1050 Brussels, Belgium; Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Br J Anaesth ; 123(2): 135-150, 2019 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255291
Surgery is an important treatment modality for the majority of solid organ cancers. Unfortunately, cancer recurrence following surgery of curative intent is common, and typically results in refractory disease and patient death. Surgery and other perioperative interventions induce a biological state conducive to the survival and growth of residual cancer cells released from the primary tumour intraoperatively, which may influence the risk of a subsequent metastatic disease. Evidence is accumulating that anaesthetic and analgesic interventions could affect many of these pathophysiological processes, influencing risk of cancer recurrence in either a beneficial or detrimental way. Much of this evidence is from experimental in vitro and in vivo models, with clinical evidence largely limited to retrospective observational studies or post hoc analysis of RCTs originally designed to evaluate non-cancer outcomes. This narrative review summarises the current state of evidence regarding the potential effect of perioperative anaesthetic and analgesic interventions on cancer biology and clinical outcomes. Proving a causal link will require data from prospective RCTs with oncological outcomes as primary endpoints, a number of which will report in the coming years. Until then, there is insufficient evidence to recommend any particular anaesthetic or analgesic technique for patients undergoing tumour resection surgery on the basis that it might alter the risk of recurrence or metastasis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Perioperativa / Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente / Analgesia / Anestesia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Perioperativa / Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente / Analgesia / Anestesia / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Anaesth Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido