Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can mammogram readers swiftly and effectively learn to interpret first post-contrast acquisition subtracted (FAST) MRI, a type of abbreviated breast MRI?: a single centre data-interpretation study.
Jones, Lyn I; Geach, Rebecca; Harding, Sam A; Foy, Christopher; Taylor, Victoria; Marshall, Andrea; Taylor-Phillips, Sian; Dunn, Janet A.
Afiliación
  • Jones LI; North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Geach R; North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Harding SA; North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Foy C; Research Design Service South West Gloucester Office, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leadon House, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester GL1 3NN, UK.
  • Taylor V; North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Marshall A; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Taylor-Phillips S; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
  • Dunn JA; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Br J Radiol ; 92(1104): 20190663, 2019 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31559859
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether NHS breast screening programme (NHSBSP) mammogram readers could effectively interpret first post-contrast acquisition subtracted (FAST) MRI, for intended use in screening for breast cancer. METHODS: Eight NHSBSP mammogram readers from a single centre (four who also read breast MRI (Group 1) and four who do not (Group 2)) were given structured FAST MRI reader training (median 4 h: 32 min). They then prospectively interpreted 125 FAST MRIs (250 breasts: 194 normal and 56 cancer) comprising a consecutive series of screening MRIs enriched with additional cancer cases from 2015, providing 2000 interpretations. Readers were blinded to other readers' opinions and to clinical information. Categorisation followed the NHSBSP MRI reporting categorisation, with categories 4 and 5 considered indicative of cancer. Diagnostic accuracy (reference standard: histology or 2 years' follow-up) and agreement between readers were determined. RESULTS: The accuracy achieved by Group 2 (847/1000 (85%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 82-87%)) was 5% less than that of Group 1 (898/1000 (90%; 95% CI 88-92)). Good inter-reader agreement was seen between both Group 1 readers (κ = 0.66; 95% CI 0.61-0.71) and Group 2 readers (κ = 0.63; 95% CI 0.58-0.68). The median time taken to interpret each FAST MRI was Group 1: 34 s (range 3-351) and Group 2: 77 s (range 11-321). CONCLUSION: Brief structured training enabled multiprofessional mammogram readers to achieve similar accuracy at FAST MRI interpretation to consultant radiologists experienced at breast MRI interpretation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: FAST MRI could be feasible from a training-the-workforce perspective for screening within NHSBSP.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Mamografía / Exactitud de los Datos / Radiólogos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Radiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Mama / Neoplasias de la Mama / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Mamografía / Exactitud de los Datos / Radiólogos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Radiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Reino Unido