Effects of manufacturing methods on the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the survival rate of ceramic and indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays manufactured according to different methods (CAD/CAM, pressable, and stratified). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for published articles. Risk of bias, data extraction, subgroup analysis, meta-analysis, and GRADE was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, retrospective, or RCT studies, without restriction of language, from 1983 to 2019, with follow-up ≥5 years, reporting survival rates were screened independently by two reviewers in accordance with eligibility criteria. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles (12 for ceramic, one for indirect composite) met the inclusion criteria. No articles were included regarding crystalline ceramic. The estimated cumulative survival rate for CAD/CAM was 97% after 5 years and 89% after 10 years; for pressable was 95% after 5 years, and for stratified was 88% after 5 years and 93% after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the manufacturing method, vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Vitreous ceramic inlays, onlays, and overlays showed high survival, regardless of the manufacturing method, providing evidence that these restorations are a safe treatment.