Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modifying and validating the social responsiveness scale edition 2 for use with deaf children and young people.
Wright, Barry; Phillips, Helen; Le Couteur, Ann; Sweetman, Jennifer; Hodkinson, Rachel; Ralph-Lewis, Amelia; Hayward, Emily; Brennan, Alice; Mulloy, Josie; Day, Natalie; Bland, Martin; Allgar, Victoria.
Afiliación
  • Wright B; University of York, York, England.
  • Phillips H; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Le Couteur A; Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
  • Sweetman J; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Hodkinson R; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Ralph-Lewis A; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
  • Hayward E; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Brennan A; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Mulloy J; Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leatherhead, United Kingdom.
  • Day N; Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, York, England.
  • Bland M; University of York, York, England.
  • Allgar V; University of York, York, England.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0243162, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284813
A Delphi consensus methodology was used to adapt a screening tool, the Social Responsiveness Scale- 2 (SRS-2), for use with deaf children including those whose preferred communication method is sign language. Using this approach; 27 international experts (The Delphi International Expert Panel), on the topic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in deaf people, contributed to the review of item content. A criterion for agreement was set at 80% of experts on each item (with 75% acceptable in the final fourth round). The agreed modifications are discussed. The modified SRS-2 research adaptation for deaf people (referred to here as the "SRS-2 Deaf adaptation") was then translated into British Sign Language using a robust translation methodology and validated in England in a sample of 198 deaf children, 76 with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) and 122 without ASD. The SRS-2 Deaf adaptation was compared blind to a NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guideline standard clinical assessment. The area under the Receiver Operating (ROC) curve was 0.811 (95% CI: 0.753, 0.869), with an optimal cut-off value of 73, which gave a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 67%. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient was 0.968 suggesting high internal consistency. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.897, supporting test-retest reliability. This performance is equivalent to similar instruments used for screening ASD in the hearing population.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sordera / Interacción Social Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sordera / Interacción Social Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos