Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Digital pen technology for conducting cognitive assessments: a cross-over study with older adults.
Heimann-Steinert, A; Latendorf, A; Prange, A; Sonntag, D; Müller-Werdan, U.
Afiliación
  • Heimann-Steinert A; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health; Geriatrics Research Group, Reinickendorfer Str. 61, 13347, Berlin, Germany. anika.heimann-steinert@charite.de.
  • Latendorf A; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health; Geriatrics Research Group, Reinickendorfer Str. 61, 13347, Berlin, Germany.
  • Prange A; German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, 66123, Saarbruecken, Germany.
  • Sonntag D; German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI GmbH), Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, 66123, Saarbruecken, Germany.
  • Müller-Werdan U; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health; Geriatrics Research Group, Reinickendorfer Str. 61, 13347, Berlin, Germany.
Psychol Res ; 85(8): 3075-3083, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33331957
Many digitalized cognitive assessments exist to increase reliability, standardization, and objectivity. Particularly in older adults, the performance of digitized cognitive assessments can lead to poorer test results if they are unfamiliar with the computer, mouse, keyboard, or touch screen. In a cross-over design study, 40 older adults (age M = 74.4 ± 4.1 years) conducted the Trail Making Test A and B with a digital pen (digital pen tests, DPT) and a regular pencil (pencil tests, PT) to identify differences in performance. Furthermore, the tests conducted with a digital pen were analyzed manually (manual results, MR) and electronically (electronic results, ER) by an automized system algorithm to determine the possibilities of digital pen evaluation. ICC(2,k) showed a good level of agreement for TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.668) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.734) between PT and DPT. When comparing MR and ER, ICC(2,k) showed an excellent level of agreement in TMT A (ICC(2,k) = 0.999) and TMT B (ICC(2,k) = 0.994). The frequency of pen lifting correlates significantly with the execution time in TMT A (r = 0.372, p = 0.030) and TMT B (r = 0.567, p < 0.001). A digital pen can be used to perform the Trail Making Test, as it has been shown that there is no difference in the results due to the type of pen used. With a digital pen, the advantages of digitized testing can be used without having to accept the disadvantages.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tecnología / Cognición Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tecnología / Cognición Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania Pais de publicación: Alemania