Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Feasibility of replacing the ICD-10-CM with the ICD-11 for morbidity coding: A content analysis.
Fung, Kin Wah; Xu, Julia; McConnell-Lamptey, Shannon; Pickett, Donna; Bodenreider, Olivier.
Afiliación
  • Fung KW; National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Xu J; National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • McConnell-Lamptey S; National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
  • Pickett D; National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
  • Bodenreider O; National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(11): 2404-2411, 2021 10 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383897
OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the feasibility of replacing the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) with the International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision (ICD-11) for morbidity coding based on content analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes from each chapter covering 60% of patients were identified from Medicare claims and hospital data. Each ICD-10-CM code was recoded in the ICD-11, using postcoordination (combination of codes) if necessary. Recoding was performed by 2 terminologists independently. Failure analysis was done for cases where full representation was not achieved even with postcoordination. After recoding, the coding guidance (inclusions, exclusions, and index) of the ICD-10-CM and ICD-11 codes were reviewed for conflict. RESULTS: Overall, 23.5% of 943 codes could be fully represented by the ICD-11 without postcoordination. Postcoordination is the potential game changer. It supports the full representation of 8.6% of 943 codes. Moreover, with the addition of only 9 extension codes, postcoordination supports the full representation of 35.2% of 943 codes. Coding guidance review identified potential conflicts in 10% of codes, but mostly not affecting recoding. The majority of the conflicts resulted from differences in granularity and default coding assumptions between the ICD-11 and ICD-10-CM. CONCLUSIONS: With some minor enhancements to postcoordination, the ICD-11 can fully represent almost 60% of the most frequently used ICD-10-CM codes. Even without postcoordination, 23.5% full representation is comparable to the 24.3% of ICD-9-CM codes with exact match in the ICD-10-CM, so migrating from the ICD-10-CM to the ICD-11 is not necessarily more disruptive than from the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification to the ICD-10-CM. Therefore, the ICD-11 (without a CM) should be considered as a candidate to replace the ICD-10-CM for morbidity coding.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades / Medicare Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades / Medicare Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Aged / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Am Med Inform Assoc Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido