Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparative Analysis of Immediate and Delayed-immediate Breast Reconstruction after Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.
Christopher, Adrienne N; Morris, Martin P; Broach, Robyn B; Serletti, Joseph M.
Afiliación
  • Christopher AN; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Morris MP; Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Broach RB; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Serletti JM; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 38(6): 499-505, 2022 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34921369
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is an important component in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer. Optimal timing of therapy in relation to autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) remains clinically debated. Herein, we comparatively analyze short- and long-term outcomes between immediate ABR (I-ABR) and delayed-immediate ABR (DI-ABR) in the setting of PMRT.

METHODS:

Adult patients undergoing ABR with PMRT were separated into cohorts based on reconstructive timeline I-ABR or DI-ABR. The groups were propensity matched 11 by age, body mass index, and comorbidities. Surgical site events and long-term clinical outcomes (readmissions, reoperations, and revision procedures) were collected. Univariate analyses were completed using Pearson's chi-squared tests and Fisher's exact tests, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS:

One hundred and thirty-two flaps (66 in each cohort) were identified for inclusion. Patients with I-ABR were more likely to experience fat necrosis (p = 0.034) and skin necrosis (p < 0.001), require additional office visits (p < 0.001) and outpatient surgeries (p = 0.015) to manage complications, and undergo revision surgery after reconstruction (p < 0.001). DI-ABR patients, however, had a 42.4% incidence of complications following tissue expander placement prior to reconstruction, with 16.7% of patients requiring reoperation during this time. Only one patient (I-ABR) experienced flap loss due to a vascular complication.

CONCLUSION:

The complications encountered in both of these groups were not prohibitive to offering either treatment. Patients should be made aware of the specific and unique risks of these reconstruction timelines and involved throughout the entire decision-making process. Plastic surgeons should continue to strive to elucidate innovative approaches that facilitate enhanced quality of life without compromising oncologic therapy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Reconstr Microsurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamoplastia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Reconstr Microsurg Asunto de la revista: NEUROCIRURGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article