Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of oral targeted treatments in pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu, Hui-Ru; Kuang, Hong-Yu; Li, Qiang; Ji, Xiao-Juan.
Afiliación
  • Zhu HR; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Department of Ultrasound, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Kuang HY; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
  • Li Q; Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
  • Ji XJ; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 915470, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35983180
Background: Although pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a fatal disease, specific drugs have been used to treat PAH. These drugs predominantly target these three pathobiological pathways: Endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), nitric oxide (NO), and prostanoids pathways. In this review, we aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of oral targeted treatments for PAH. Methods: The national library of medicine (MEDLINE), excerpta medica database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials that compared the oral targeted drugs with placebos were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for variables with dichotomous outcomes, and standardized mean differences with continuous outcomes variables. Additionally, the mean of the differences for the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was analyzed. Results: In total, 23 studies involving 7,121 patients were included in this study. These studies show that orally PAH-specific drugs could decrease the risk of clinical worsening events, with an OR of 0.55 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, these drugs could improve exercise capacity, showing a 21.74-m increase in 6MWD (95% CI: 17.53-25.95 m) and cause a greater amelioration of functional class (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.47-0.76). Additionally, subgroup analysis indicated that compared with placebo, ERAs, and drugs in the NO pathway were most effective and safe, which are associated with an improvement in exercise capacity, 6MWD, and worsening events-free survival rate. Conclusion: Nitric oxide exhibited the most prominent clinical effect on exercise tolerance. However, in the subgroup analysis, oral targeted drugs of different pathways show applicability to different populations, which highlights the need for precise treatment in the clinical setting. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=297946], identifier [CRD 42022297946].
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China Pais de publicación: Suiza