Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring shared decision-making in younger and older adults with depression.
Brodney, Suzanne; Valentine, K D; Vo, H A; Cosenza, Carol; Barry, Michael J; Sepucha, Karen R.
Afiliación
  • Brodney S; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • Valentine KD; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • Vo HA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Cosenza C; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
  • Barry MJ; Center for Survey Research, University of Massachusetts, Boston - 100 Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA 02125, USA.
  • Sepucha KR; Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, 16th Floor, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 34(4)2022 Oct 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36161492
BACKGROUND: This study examined the performance of the shared decision-making (SDM) Process scale in patients with depression, compared alternative wording of two items in the scale and explored performance in younger adults. METHODS: A web-based non-probability panel of respondents with depression aged 18-39 (younger) or 40-75 (older) who talked with a health-care provider about starting or stopping treatment for depression in the past year were surveyed. Respondents completed one of two versions of the SDM Process scale that differed in the wording of pros and cons items and completed measures of decisional conflict, decision regret and who made the decision (mainly the respondent, mainly the provider or together). A subset of respondents completed a retest survey by 1 week. We examined how version and age group impacted SDM Process scores and calculated construct validity and retest reliability. We hypothesized that patients with higher SDM Process scores would show less decisional conflict using the SURE scale (range = 0-4); top score = no conflict versus other and less regret (range 1-4; higher scores indicated more regret). RESULTS: The sample (N = 494) was majority White, non-Hispanic (82%) and female (72%), 48% were younger and 23% had a high school education or less. SDM Process scores did not differ by version (P = 0.09). SDM Process scores were higher for younger respondents (M = 2.6, SD = 1.0) than older respondents (M = 2.3, SD = 1.1; P = 0.001). Higher SDM Process scores were also associated with no decisional conflict (M = 2.6, SD = 0.99 vs. M = 2.1, SD = 1.2; P < 0.001) and less decision regret (r = -0.18, P < 0.001). Retest reliability was intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: The SDM Process scale demonstrated validity and retest reliability in younger adults, and changes to item wording did not impact scores. Although younger respondents reported more SDM, there is room for improvement in SDM for depression treatment decisions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Depresión Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Qual Health Care Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Toma de Decisiones / Depresión Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Qual Health Care Asunto de la revista: SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Reino Unido