Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic management of encrusted ureteral stents: outcomes and tips and tricks.
Tsaturyan, Arman; Faria-Costa, Gabriel; Peteinaris, Angelis; Lattarulo, Marco; Martinez, Begona Ballesta; Vrettos, Theofanis; Liatsikos, Evangelos; Kallidonis, Panagiotis.
Afiliación
  • Tsaturyan A; Department of Urology, University of Patras Medical School, Rio, 26500, Patras, Greece. tsaturyanarman@yahoo.com.
  • Faria-Costa G; Department of Urology, Erebouni Medical Center, Yerevan, Armenia. tsaturyanarman@yahoo.com.
  • Peteinaris A; Department of Urology, Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal.
  • Lattarulo M; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Martinez BB; Department of Urology, University of Patras Medical School, Rio, 26500, Patras, Greece.
  • Vrettos T; Department of Urology, University of Patras Medical School, Rio, 26500, Patras, Greece.
  • Liatsikos E; Department of Urology, University of Patras Medical School, Rio, 26500, Patras, Greece.
  • Kallidonis P; Department of Anesthesiology and ICU, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
World J Urol ; 41(5): 1415-1421, 2023 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37024556
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To report our experience in the management of encrusted ureteral stents (EUS) and provide technical insight of our endourological approaches for difficult scenarios posed by this entity. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective evaluation of a longitudinally collected database of 58 patients with encrusted US between December 2012 and May 2022 was performed. The ureteral stents were initially inserted due to obstructive uropathy, pyelonephritis or after a successful endoscopic procedure for urolithiasis. A combination of antegrade/retrograde treatment in single or multiple sessions took place for the retrieval of the encrusted stents. Non-contrast enhanced computer tomography was used for the follow-up of the patients at 1-month after the removal of the encrusted stent.

RESULTS:

Overall 58 patients, 39 males and 19 females with a median age of 51 years old were included in the study. Indwelling time was < 6 months, 6-12 months and > 12 months in 22%, 57% and 21% of the cases, respectively. All US were successfully removed. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) and flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) were used in 90% of the cases. In 10% of the cases, a second-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was performed. All US were successfully released. Stone-free rate was 84% at 1-month. Overall complication rate was 10.5% (mostly postoperative fevers, 5.4%).

CONCLUSION:

Removal of the encrusted US is a challenging procedure. Appropriate decision-making and knowledge of specific tricks may result in safe and successful management of significant EUS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Uréter / Litotricia / Cálculos Ureterales Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Grecia