Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External control arms: COVID-19 reveals the merits of using real world evidence in real-time for clinical and public health investigations.
Silva, Patrick; Janjan, Nora; Ramos, Kenneth S; Udeani, George; Zhong, Lixian; Ory, Marcia G; Smith, Matthew Lee.
Afiliación
  • Silva P; Institute of Bioscience and Technology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Janjan N; Center for Community Health and Aging, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Ramos KS; Institute of Bioscience and Technology and Department of Translational Medical Sciences, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Udeani G; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Zhong L; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Ory MG; Center for Community Health and Aging, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
  • Smith ML; Center for Community Health and Aging, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1198088, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37484840
ABSTRACT
Randomized controlled trials are considered the 'gold standard' to reduce bias by randomizing patients to an experimental intervention, versus placebo or standard of care cohort. There are inherent challenges to enrolling a standard of care or cohorts costs, site engagement logistics, socioeconomic variability, patient willingness, ethics of placebo interventions, cannibalizing the treatment arm population, and extending study duration. The COVID-19 pandemic has magnified aspects of constraints in trial recruitment and logistics, spurring innovative approaches to reducing trial sizes, accelerating trial accrual while preserving statistical rigor. Using data from medical records and databases allows for construction of external control arms that reduce the costs of an external control arm (ECA) randomized to standard of care. Simultaneously examining covariates of the clinical outcomes in ECAs that are being measured in the interventional arm can be particularly useful in phase 2 trials to better understand social and genetic determinants of clinical outcomes that might inform pivotal trial design. The FDA and EMA have promulgated a number of publicly available guidance documents and qualification reports that inform the use of this regulatory science tool to streamline clinical development, of phase 4 surveillance, and policy aspects of clinical outcomes research. Availability and quality of real-world data (RWD) are a prevalent impediment to the use of ECAs given such data is not collected with the rigor and deliberateness that characterizes prospective interventional control arm data. Conversely, in the case of contemporary control arms, a clinical trial outcome can be compared to a contemporary standard of care in cases where the standard of care is evolving at a fast pace, such as the use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer care. Innovative statistical methods are an essential aspect of an ECA strategy and regulatory paths for these innovative approaches have been navigated, qualified, and in some cases published.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Idioma: En Revista: Front Med (Lausanne) Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos