Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Efficacy of Pharmacological Treatments for Acne Vulgaris: A Network Meta-Analysis of 221 Randomized Controlled Trials.
Huang, Chung-Yen; Chang, I-Jing; Bolick, Nicole; Hsu, Wan-Ting; Su, Chin-Hua; Hsieh, Tyng-Shiuan; Huang, I-Hsuan; Lee, Chien-Chang.
Afiliación
  • Huang CY; Department of Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Chang IJ; Department of Dermatology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Bolick N; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Hsu WT; Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  • Su CH; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Hsieh TS; Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Huang IH; Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
  • Lee CC; Department of Dermatology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ann Fam Med ; 21(4): 358-369, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487721
PURPOSE: Acne is an extremely common skin disease with an estimated global prevalence of 9.4%. We aim to provide comprehensive comparisons of the common pharmacological treatments for acne. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of pharmacological therapies for acne vulgaris in patients of any age and sex and with a treatment duration of >2 weeks were included. PubMed and Embase databases were searched from inception until February 2022. Our prespecified primary end points were mean percentage reduction in total, inflammatory, and noninflammatory lesions. Treatment ranking was determined by P values. RESULTS: There were 210 articles describing 221 trials and 37 interventions included in the analysis. Our primary analysis of percentage reduction in total lesion count had 65,601 patients enrolled. Across all trials, the mean age was 20.4 years. The median duration of treatment was 12 weeks. The median total, inflammatory, and noninflammatory lesion counts were 72, 27, and 44, respectively. The most effective treatment was oral isotretinoin (mean difference [MD] = 48.41; P = 1.00), followed by triple therapy containing a topical antibiotic, a topical retinoid, and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) (MD = 38.15; P = .95) and by triple therapy containing an oral antibiotic, a topical retinoid, and BPO (MD = 34.83; P = .90). For monotherapies, oral or topical antibiotics or topical retinoids have comparable efficacy for inflammatory lesions, while oral or topical antibiotics have less effect on noninflammatory lesions. CONCLUSION: The most effective treatment for acne is oral isotretinoin, followed by triple therapies containing a topical retinoid, BPO, and an antibiotic. We present detailed comparisons of each intervention to serve as a practical database.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acné Vulgar / Fármacos Dermatológicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Acné Vulgar / Fármacos Dermatológicos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos