Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differences between patients in whom physicians agree versus disagree about the preoperative diagnosis of heart failure.
Kamyszek, Reed W; Newman, Noah; Ragheb, Jacqueline W; Sjoding, Michael W; Joo, Hyeon; Maile, Michael D; Cassidy, Ruth B; Golbus, Jessica R; Engoren, Milo C; Mathis, Michael R.
Afiliación
  • Kamyszek RW; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Newman N; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Ragheb JW; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Sjoding MW; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Computational Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Joo H; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Maile MD; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Cassidy RB; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Golbus JR; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Engoren MC; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Mathis MR; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Computational Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mathism@med.umich.edu.
J Clin Anesth ; 90: 111226, 2023 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549434
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To quantify preoperative heart failure (HF) diagnostic agreement and identify characteristics of patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the diagnosis. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery at an academic center between 2015 and 2019. PATIENTS: 40,659 patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, among which a stratified subsample of 1018 patients with and without documented HF was reviewed. INTERVENTIONS: Via a panel of physicians frequently managing patients with HF (cardiologists, cardiac anesthesiologists, intensivists), detailed chart reviews were performed (two per patient; median review time 32 min per reviewer per patient) to render adjudicated HF diagnoses. MEASUREMENTS: Adjudicated diagnostic agreement measures (percent agreement, Krippendorf's alpha) and univariate comparisons (standardized differences) between patients in whom physicians agreed versus disagreed about the preoperative HF diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS: Among patients with documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 80.0% of cases (consensus positive), disagreed in 13.8% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 6.3% (consensus negative). Conversely, among patients without documented HF, physicians agreed about the diagnosis in 88.0% (consensus negative), disagreed in 8.4% (disagreement), and refuted the diagnosis in 3.6% (consensus positive). The estimated agreement for the 40,659 cases was 91.1% (95% CI 88.3%-93.9%); Krippendorff's alpha was 0.77 (0.75-0.80). Compared to patients in whom physicians agreed about a HF diagnosis, patients in whom physicians disagreed exhibited fewer guideline-defined HF diagnostic criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians usually agree about HF diagnoses adjudicated via chart review, although disagreement is not uncommon and may be partly explained by heterogeneous clinical presentations. Our findings inform preoperative screening processes by identifying patients whose characteristics contribute to physician disagreement via chart review. Clinical Trial Number / Registry URL: Not applicable.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Anesth Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos