Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does COVID-19 impair V̇o2peak in patients with cardiorespiratory disease? Insight from cardiopulmonary responses to maximal exercise pre- and post-illness.
Fernandes, Igor A; Balavenkataraman, Arvind; Bonvie-Hill, Natalie E; Patel, Neal M; Taylor, Bryan J; Helgeson, Scott A.
Afiliación
  • Fernandes IA; Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
  • Balavenkataraman A; Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
  • Bonvie-Hill NE; Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
  • Patel NM; Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
  • Taylor BJ; Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
  • Helgeson SA; Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, United States.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 135(5): 1146-1156, 2023 11 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855032
Reduced exercise capacity has been suggested as a cardinal sequela of COVID-19. However, only cross-sectional approaches that either do not consider individuals with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease or account for exercise capacity before infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) support this assumption. Is reduced exercise capacity a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease? We retrospectively reviewed cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data collected across three hospitals between October 2018 and March 2022. Forty-two patients who completed a CPET before and after COVID-19 and 25 patients who performed two separate CPETs but did not contract COVID-19 (CTL) were included. Within each patient, the same test protocol was performed at the first and second CPETs. The time between CPETs was similar between the groups (COVID-19 489 ± 534 vs. CTL 534 ± 257 days, P = 0.662). The COVID-19 group performed the CPETs 312 ± 232 days before and 176 ± 110 days after infection. Exercise time, peak heart rate, peak systolic pressure, oxygen uptake (V̇o2) at anaerobic threshold, peak ventilation, and ventilatory efficiency were not different between the CPETs in both groups. Peak V̇o2 was reduced from before to after SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the change in V̇o2peak from the first to the second CPET was not different between COVID-19 vs. CTL. Accounting for V̇o2peak before COVID-19 and including a group of control patients, we find limited evidence for reduced exercise capacity as a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease.NEW & NOTEWORTHY There is accumulating evidence that reduced exercise capacity is, or can be, an outcome following COVID-19. However, evidence to date relies upon cross-sectional approaches that either do not consider patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease or account for pre-infection exercise capacity data. Accounting for V̇o2peak before COVID-19 and including a group of control patients, we find limited evidence for reduced exercise capacity as a sequela of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with concomitant cardiorespiratory disease.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Physiol (1985) Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Physiol (1985) Asunto de la revista: FISIOLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos