Improving the oral function of patients with upper and lower lip tensor fascia lata slings for patients with flaccid facial nerve palsy.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Facial nerve paralysis (FNP) often causes decreased quality of life and may lead to significant facial dysfunction. Oral competence is frequently raised as a concern by patients as it impacts nutrition, hydration, social participation, and mental health. This can result in social isolation and reduced capacity to return to vocational roles. Despite its prevalence, it is incompletely understood and rarely described. This study prospectively evaluated the impact that facial nerve static and dynamic reanimation has on oral competence, with a specific focus on speech intelligibility and the oral phase of the swallow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had a static or dynamic facial reanimation at Chris O'Brien Lifehouse due to facial nerve paralysis were recruited consecutively between September 2020 and October 2022. Their speech and swallow were analysed using patient reported outcome measures including the speech handicap index and the oral competence questionnaire, and speech intelligibility rated by the patient and their speech pathologist at baseline (up to 2-weeks prior to surgery), then at 6- and 12- months post-surgery. Outcomes were evaluated firstly by a paired analysis (pre- compared to post-operative oral competence outcomes), and secondly by a cohort analysis of static, compared to dynamic reanimation. RESULTS: 19 participants underwent a facial nerve reconstruction (10 static, 9 dynamic and static) due to pre-operative facial nerve paralysis. At 12-months improvements in both the oral competence questionnaire (OCQ) and the speech handicap index (SHI) (score reduced at a rate of 0.3 points per week and the 0.2 points respectively) and that this change met statistical significance (OCQ; p = p < 0.003, SHI; p < 0.001). Patient rated intelligibility increased 0.3 and clinician rated intelligibility increased 0.2 points per week which also significantly improved (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both static and dynamic facial reanimation procedures significantly improved both speech and swallowing measures for oral competence at 6- and 12- months post-procedure. There was not a significant difference found between static and dynamic procedures.