Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors influencing the decision-making process in breast reconstruction from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons: A qualitative study involving Korean plastic surgeons.
Yun, Ji Young; Jeon, Dong Nyeok; Jeon, Byung-Joon; Kim, Eun Key.
Afiliación
  • Yun JY; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • Jeon DN; Department of Plastic Surgery, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung, Korea.
  • Jeon BJ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim EK; Department of Plastic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: nicekek@korea.com.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 93: 72-80, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670035
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little research has been conducted on factors influencing the decision-making process for immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) options from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons, despite its significant impact on doctor-patient communication and shared decision-making. This study aims to explore the multiple factors and the mechanisms by which they interact using a qualitative methodology. We also address potential barriers to shared decision-making in IBR.

METHODS:

Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of reconstructive surgeons. Thematic analysis was used to identify key influences on IBR decision-making process from the perspective of reconstructive surgeons.

RESULTS:

Four major themes were identified 1. Patient clinical scenarios; 2. Nonclinical practice environments; 3. Reconstructive surgeon preferences; and 4. Patient consultation. Reconstructive surgeons demonstrated diverse approaches to patient clinical scenarios. High-volume centers were significantly influenced by nonclinical factors such as scheduling and operating room allocation systems. Reconstructive surgeons often had strong personal preferences for specific IBR options, shaped by their expertise, experience, and clinical environment. Based on the preliminary decision, surgeons provided information with varying degrees of neutrality. Patients varied in their knowledge and participation, resulting in variation in the final decision authority among surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study highlights the need to address nonclinical environmental constraints to improve shared decision-making process in IBR. Surgeons should recognize power imbalances in the doctor-patient relationship and be aware of their biases.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Mamoplastia / Investigación Cualitativa / Cirujanos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Relaciones Médico-Paciente / Mamoplastia / Investigación Cualitativa / Cirujanos Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Países Bajos