Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Childhood cancer models of survivorship care: a scoping review of elements of care and reported outcomes.
Bradford, Natalie; Chan, Raymond Javan; Skrabal Ross, Xiomara; Thamm, Carla; Sharwood, Erin; Pole, Jason; Cashion, Christine; Nekhlyudov, Larissa.
Afiliación
  • Bradford N; Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Natalie.bradford@qut.edu.au.
  • Chan RJ; Children's Brain Cancer Centre at Centre for Children's Health Research, 62 Graham St, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Natalie.bradford@qut.edu.au.
  • Skrabal Ross X; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  • Thamm C; Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre and School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Sharwood E; Research, Policy & Patient Department, Canteen Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Pole J; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
  • Cashion C; Endocrinology Department, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Nekhlyudov L; Queensland Digital Health Centre, Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
J Cancer Surviv ; 2024 May 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722536
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to systematically map elements of care and respective outcomes described in the literature for different models of post-treatment care for survivors of childhood cancer.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase were searched with combinations of free text terms, synonyms, and MeSH terms using Boolean operators and are current to January 2024. We included studies that described post-treatment cancer survivorship models of care and reported patient or service level elements of care or outcomes, which we mapped to the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework domains.

RESULTS:

Thirty-eight studies with diverse designs were included representing 6101 childhood cancer survivors (or their parent/caregiver) and 14 healthcare professionals. A diverse range of models of care were reported, including paediatric oncologist-led long-term follow-up, multi-disciplinary survivorship clinics, shared-care, and primary care-led follow-up. Elements of care at the individual level most commonly included surveillance for cancer recurrence as well as assessment of physical and psychological effects. At the service level, satisfaction with care was frequently reported but few studies reported how treatment-related-late effects were managed. The evidence does not support one model of care over another.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gaps in evidence exist regarding distal outcomes such as costs, health care utilization, and mortality, as well as understanding outcomes of managing chronic disease and physical or psychological effects. The findings synthesized in this review provide a valuable reference point for future service planning and evaluation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Decades of research highlight the importance of survivorship care for childhood cancer survivors who are at risk of serious treatment-related late effects. This review emphasizes there is no single, 'one-size fits all' approach for delivering such care to this vulnerable population.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Surviv Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos