Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fit-for-Purpose Ki-67 Immunohistochemistry Assays for Breast Cancer.
Torlakovic, Emina E; Baniak, Nick; Barnes, Penny J; Chancey, Keith; Chen, Liam; Cheung, Carol; Clairefond, Sylvie; Cutz, Jean-Claude; Faragalla, Hala; Gravel, Denis H; Dakin Hache, Kelly; Iyengar, Pratibha; Komel, Michael; Kos, Zuzana; Lacroix-Triki, Magali; Marolt, Monna J; Mrkonjic, Miralem; Mulligan, Anna Marie; Nofech-Mozes, Sharon; Park, Paul C; Plotkin, Anna; Raphael, Simon; Rees, Henrike; Seno, H Rommel; Thai, Duc-Vinh; Troxell, Megan L; Varma, Sonal; Wang, Gang; Wang, Tao; Wehrli, Bret; Bigras, Gilbert.
Afiliación
  • Torlakovic EE; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. Electronic address: emina.torlakovic@usask.ca.
  • Baniak N; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatoon City Hospital, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Barnes PJ; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Chancey K; Agilent Technologies, Carpinteria, California.
  • Chen L; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Cheung C; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Clairefond S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and University of Saskatchewan Tumour Biobank, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Cutz JC; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Faragalla H; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto and Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gravel DH; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Dakin Hache K; Department of Pathology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Iyengar P; Laboratory Medicine and Genetics Program, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Komel M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, North York General Hospital, North York, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kos Z; Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Lacroix-Triki M; Department of Medical Biology and Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • Marolt MJ; Pathology, M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital, Edina, Minnesota.
  • Mrkonjic M; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mulligan AM; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nofech-Mozes S; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Park PC; Department of Pathology, Shared Health; Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba; Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Plotkin A; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Raphael S; North York General Hospital and LMP University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rees H; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Seno HR; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pasqua Hospital, University of Saskatchewan and Saskatchewan Health Authority, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Thai DV; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Troxell ML; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Varma S; Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Kingston Health Science Center & Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wang G; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Wang T; Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, Kingston Health Science Center & Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wehrli B; London Health Sciences Centre and Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bigras G; Faculty of medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Lab Invest ; 104(7): 102076, 2024 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729353
ABSTRACT
New therapies are being developed for breast cancer, and in this process, some "old" biomarkers are reutilized and given a new purpose. It is not always recognized that by changing a biomarker's intended use, a new biomarker assay is created. The Ki-67 biomarker is typically assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to provide a proliferative index in breast cancer. Canadian laboratories assessed the analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of their Ki-67 IHC laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) of relevance for the LDTs' clinical utility. Canadian clinical IHC laboratories enrolled in the Canadian Biomarker Quality Assurance Pilot Run for Ki-67 in breast cancer by invitation. The Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay was employed as a study reference assay. The Dako central laboratory was the reference laboratory. Participants received unstained slides of breast cancer tissue microarrays with 32 cases and performed their in-house Ki-67 assays. The results were assessed using QuPath, an open-source software application for bioimage analysis. Positive percent agreement (PPA, sensitivity) and negative percent agreement (NPA, specificity) were calculated against the Dako Ki-67 IHC pharmDx assay for 5%, 10%, 20%, and 30% cutoffs. Overall, PPA and NPA varied depending on the selected cutoff; participants were more successful with 5% and 10%, than with 20% and 30% cutoffs. Only 4 of 16 laboratories had robust IHC protocols with acceptable PPA for all cutoffs. The lowest PPA for the 5% cutoff was 85%, for 10% was 63%, for 20% was 14%, and for 30% was 13%. The lowest NPA for the 5% cutoff was 50%, for 10% was 33%, for 20% was 50%, and for 30% was 57%. Despite many years of international efforts to standardize IHC testing for Ki-67 in breast cancer, our results indicate that Canadian clinical LDTs have a wide analytical sensitivity range and poor agreement for 20% and 30% cutoffs. The poor agreement was not due to the readout but rather due to IHC protocol conditions. International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (IKWG) recommendations related to Ki-67 IHC standardization cannot take full effect without reliable fit-for-purpose reference materials that are required for the initial assay calibration, assay performance monitoring, and proficiency testing.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Inmunohistoquímica / Antígeno Ki-67 Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lab Invest Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Inmunohistoquímica / Antígeno Ki-67 Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Lab Invest Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos