Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nasal inhalation does not improve memory of visual repetitions.
Thunell, Evelina; Francis, Gregory; Dal Bò, Elisa; Schaefer, Martin; Lundström, Johan N; Arshamian, Artin.
Afiliación
  • Thunell E; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Francis G; Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
  • Dal Bò E; Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Schaefer M; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lundström JN; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Arshamian A; Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Psychophysiology ; : e14609, 2024 May 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747502
ABSTRACT
Several studies suggest that breathing entrains neural oscillations and thereby improves visual detection and memory performance during nasal inhalation. However, the evidence for this association is mixed, with some studies finding no, minor, or opposite effects. Here, we tested whether nasal breathing phase influences memory of repeated images presented in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task. The RSVP task is ideal for studying the effects of respiratory-entrained oscillations on visual memory because it engages critical aspects of sensory encoding that depend on oscillatory activity, such as fast processing of natural images, repetition detection, memory encoding, and retrieval. It also enables the presentation of a large number of stimuli during each phase of the breathing cycle. In two separate experiments (n = 72 and n = 142, respectively) where participants were explicitly asked to breathe through their nose, we found that nasal breathing phase at target presentation did not significantly affect memory performance. An exploratory analysis in the first experiment suggested a potential benefit for targets appearing approximately 1 s after inhalation. However, this finding was not replicated in the pre-registered second experiment with a larger sample. Thus, in two large sample experiments, we found no measurable impact of breathing phase on memory performance in the RSVP task. These results suggest that the natural breathing cycle does not have a significant impact on memory for repeated images and raise doubts about the idea that visual memory is broadly affected by the breathing phase.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychophysiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Psychophysiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos