Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is cryoablation a valid option for renal cell carcinomas in direct contact with critical organs?
Nagata, Shoma; Matsui, Yusuke; Tomita, Koji; Uka, Mayu; Kawabata, Takahiro; Umakoshi, Noriyuki; Munetomo, Kazuaki; Kawada, Maria; Iguchi, Toshihiro; Hiraki, Takao.
Afiliación
  • Nagata S; Department of Radiology, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
  • Matsui Y; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Tomita K; Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
  • Uka M; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kawabata T; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Umakoshi N; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Munetomo K; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Kawada M; Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
  • Iguchi T; Department of Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
  • Hiraki T; Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757702
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to assess the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) contacting critical organs without intervening fat tissue. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Twenty-three patients with 24 RCCs (mean size, 28.8 mm) contacting critical organs on preprocedural images were included. The organ displacement techniques, technical success, efficacy, and adverse events per Clavien-Dindo classification were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS:

The organs contacting the RCCs included the colon (n = 16), pancreas (n = 3), duodenum (n = 3), small intestine (n = 1), and stomach (n = 1). In all procedures, hydrodissection was conducted, and probe traction was additionally utilized in one to displace organs. Two procedures were terminated with an insufficient ice-ball margin (<6 mm) due to recurring proximity of the colon or thermal sink effect by renal hilar vessels, yielding a technical success rate of 91.6% (22/24). No severe adverse events were noted. All patients were alive without any metastases during a median follow-up of 34.4 months. The primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 91.6% (22/24) and 95.8% (23/24) of tumors, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

PCA can be a valid option for RCCs contacting critical organs with a good safety profile and sufficient technical efficacy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Asunto de la revista: TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol Asunto de la revista: TERAPEUTICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón Pais de publicación: Reino Unido