Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dissimilarity in flea and host assemblages and their interaction networks along a spatial distance gradient: different patterns revealed by different network dissimilarity metrics.
Krasnov, Boris R; Barki, Goni; Khokhlova, Irina S.
Afiliación
  • Krasnov BR; Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental and Energy Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel. krasnov@bgu.ac.il.
  • Barki G; Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Swiss Institute for Dryland Environmental and Energy Research, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, 84990, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
  • Khokhlova IS; French Associates Institute for Agriculture and Biotechnology of Drylands, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sede Boqer Campus, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel.
Oecologia ; 205(2): 397-409, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38842685
ABSTRACT
We investigated the distance-decay pattern (an increase in dissimilarity with increasing geographic distance) in regional assemblages of fleas and their small mammalian hosts, as well as their interaction networks, in four biogeographic realms. Dissimilarity of assemblages (ßtotal) was partitioned into species richness differences (ßrich) and species replacement (ßrepl) components. Dissimilarity of networks was assessed using two metrics (a) whole network dissimilarity (ßWN) partitioned into species replacement (ßST) and interaction rewiring (ßOS) components and (b) D statistics, measuring dissimilarity in the pure structure of the networks, without using information on species identities and calculated for hosts-shared-by-fleas networks (Dh) and fleas-shared-by-hosts networks (Df). We asked whether the distance-decay pattern (a) occurs among interactor assemblages or their interaction networks; (b) depends on the network dissimilarity metric used; and (c) differs between realms. The ßtotal and ßrepl of flea and host assemblages increased with distance in all realms except for host assemblages in the Afrotropics. ßrich for flea and host assemblages increased with distance in the Nearctic only. In networks, ßWN and ßST demonstrated a distance-decay pattern, whereas ßOS was mainly spatially invariant except in the Neotropics. Correlations of Dh or Df and geographic distance were mostly non-significant. We conclude that investigations of dissimilarity in interaction networks should include both types of dissimilarity metrics (those that consider partner identities and those that consider the pure structure of networks). This will allow elucidating the predictability of some facets of network dissimilarity and the unpredictability of other facets.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Siphonaptera Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Oecologia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel Pais de publicación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Siphonaptera Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Oecologia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Israel Pais de publicación: Alemania