Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of PCR Cycle Threshold and Clinical Interventions to Aid in the Management of Pediatric Clostridioides difficile Patients.
Suleiman, Mohammed; Tang, Patrick; Imam, Omar; Morales, Princess; Altrmanini, Diyna; Barr, Kelli L; Roberts, Jill C; Pérez-López, Andrés.
Afiliación
  • Suleiman M; Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar.
  • Tang P; Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar.
  • Imam O; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine in Qatar, Doha P.O. Box 24144, Qatar.
  • Morales P; Department of Infectious Diseases, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar.
  • Altrmanini D; Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar.
  • Barr KL; Department of Pathology, Sidra Medicine, Doha P.O. Box 26999, Qatar.
  • Roberts JC; Center for Global Health and Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
  • Pérez-López A; Center for Global Health and Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Microorganisms ; 12(6)2024 Jun 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38930564
ABSTRACT
Better diagnostic tools are needed to improve the diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) and reduce the overtreatment of colonized children. In this study, we evaluated two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile and the Gastroenteritis PCR Panel by QIAstat-Dx) as a standalone method in combination with the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value in positive samples to predict the presence of free toxins. We also evaluated the clinical impact of reporting toxin production results and provided comments alongside the PCR results in our pediatric population. PCR-positive stool samples from pediatric patients (aged 2 to 18 years old) were included in our study and tested for the presence of toxins A and B using the C. difficile Quik Chek Complete kit. For the clinical intervention, the CDI treatment rates 6 months pre- and post-intervention were compared. The use of PCR Ct value showed excellent sensitivity (100%) at a Ct value cutoff of 26.1 and 27.2 using the Cepheid GeneXpert C. difficile and the Gastroenteritis PCR Panel by QIAstat-Dx, respectively, while the toxin test showed inferior sensitivity of 64% in the PCR-positive samples. In addition, CDI treatment rates were decreased by 23% post-intervention. The results of our study suggest that nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) assays supplemented by the use of PCR Ct value for positive samples can be used as standalone tests to differentiate CDI from colonization. Furthermore, the reporting of toxin production along with the PCR results can help reduce the unnecessary treatment of colonized children.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Microorganisms Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Qatar Pais de publicación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Microorganisms Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Qatar Pais de publicación: Suiza