Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Critical Examination of the Clinical Diagnosis of Functional Tic-like Behaviors.
Andersen, Kaja; Cavanna, Andrea Eugenio; Szejko, Natalia; Müller-Vahl, Kirsten R; Hedderly, Tammy; Skov, Liselotte; Mol Debes, Nanette.
Afiliación
  • Andersen K; Department of Pediatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Cavanna AE; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Szejko N; Department of Neuropsychiatry, BSMHFT and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Müller-Vahl KR; School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston Brain Centre, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
  • Hedderly T; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
  • Skov L; Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Mol Debes N; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mov Disord Clin Pract ; 11(9): 1065-1071, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38940477
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, movement disorder clinics have seen an increase in patients with an unusual type of tic-like symptoms young adults with abrupt onset complex behaviors. It was quickly suspected that these patients suffered from functional neurological symptoms, later named Functional Tic-Like Behaviors (FTLB). Subsequent research on the differential diagnosis between FTLB and tics has been substantial and led to the development of diagnostic checklists.

OBJECTIVES:

We conducted a theoretical reappraisal of the FTLB literature to clarify the validity of the concept and its diagnostic implications.

METHODS:

This paper addresses several key aspects of the current FTLB literature circular reasoning, the complications of the FTLB phenomenology and demographics, the impact of FTLB on tic literature at large, and issues with alignment of the FTLB concept with the diagnostic criteria for functional disorders.

RESULTS:

The clinical approach to FTLB might involve circular reasoning due to a lack of clinical benchmarks. The FTLB phenomenology and demographics may need more work to ensure a lack of bias and a proper description of this patient group including a clear distinction from tics. The impact of the FTLB discussion on the wider literature needs consideration. The validation of positive signs may help with both these endeavors and pave way to the inclusion of FTLB within psychiatric classification systems. Furthermore, the coexistence of FTLB and tics within the same patient needs to be addressed.

CONCLUSION:

More research may be needed to fully establish the diagnosis of FTLB and differentiate it from tics.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Tic / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mov Disord Clin Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trastornos de Tic / COVID-19 Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mov Disord Clin Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos