Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term impact of artificial intelligence on colorectal adenoma detection in high-risk colonoscopy.
Chow, Kenneth W; Bell, Matthew T; Cumpian, Nicholas; Amour, Maryanne; Hsu, Ryan H; Eysselein, Viktor E; Srivastava, Neetika; Fleischman, Michael W; Reicher, Sofiya.
Afiliación
  • Chow KW; Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States. kwchow555@gmail.com.
  • Bell MT; Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Cumpian N; Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Amour M; Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Hsu RH; Department of Bioengineering, Jacobs School of Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States.
  • Eysselein VE; Department of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Srivastava N; Department of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Fleischman MW; Department of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
  • Reicher S; Department of Gastroenterology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90502, United States.
World J Gastrointest Endosc ; 16(6): 335-342, 2024 Jun 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946853
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Improved adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been demonstrated with artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy. However, data on the real-world application of AI and its effect on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening outcomes is limited.

AIM:

To analyze the long-term impact of AI on a diverse at-risk patient population undergoing diagnostic colonoscopy for positive CRC screening tests or symptoms.

METHODS:

AI software (GI Genius, Medtronic) was implemented into the standard procedure protocol in November 2022. Data was collected on patient demographics, procedure indication, polyp size, location, and pathology. CRC screening outcomes were evaluated before and at different intervals after AI introduction with one year of follow-up.

RESULTS:

We evaluated 1008 colonoscopies (278 pre-AI, 255 early post-AI, 285 established post-AI, and 190 late post-AI). The ADR was 38.1% pre-AI, 42.0% early post-AI (P = 0.77), 40.0% established post-AI (P = 0.44), and 39.5% late post-AI (P = 0.77). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (PDR, baseline 59.7%), advanced ADR (baseline 16.2%), and non-neoplastic PDR (baseline 30.0%) before and after AI introduction.

CONCLUSION:

In patients with an increased pre-test probability of having an abnormal colonoscopy, the current generation of AI did not yield enhanced CRC screening metrics over high-quality colonoscopy. Although the potential of AI in colonoscopy is undisputed, current AI technology may not universally elevate screening metrics across all situations and patient populations. Future studies that analyze different AI systems across various patient populations are needed to determine the most effective role of AI in optimizing CRC screening in clinical practice.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos