Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide.
Barros-Costa, Matheus; Barros-Candido, Julia Ramos; Sampaio-Oliveira, Matheus; Freitas, Deborah Queiroz; Sverzut, Alexander Tadeu; Oliveira, Matheus L.
Afiliación
  • Barros-Costa M; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Barros-Candido JR; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Sampaio-Oliveira M; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Freitas DQ; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Sverzut AT; Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
  • Oliveira ML; Division of Oral Radiology, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.
Imaging Sci Dent ; 54(2): 191-199, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38948193
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The aim of this study was to evaluate image artifacts in the vicinity of dental implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained with different spatial orientations, tube current levels, and metal artifact reduction algorithm (MAR) conditions. Materials and

Methods:

One dental implant and 2 tubes filled with a radiopaque solution were placed in the posterior region of a mandible using a surgical guide to ensure parallel alignment. CBCT scans were acquired with the mandible in 2 spatial orientations in relation to the X-ray projection plane (standard and modified) at 3 tube current levels 5, 8, and 11 mA. CBCT scans were repeated without the implant and were reconstructed with and without MAR. The mean voxel and noise values of each tube were obtained and compared using multi-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=0.05).

Results:

Mean voxel values were significantly higher and noise values were significantly lower in the modified orientation than in the standard orientation (P<0.05). MAR activation and tube current levels did not show significant differences in most cases of the modified spatial orientation and in the absence of the dental implant (P>0.05).

Conclusion:

Modifying the spatial orientation of the head increased brightness and reduced spatial orientation noise in adjacent regions of a dental implant, with no influence from the tube current level and MAR.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Imaging Sci Dent Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Corea del Sur

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Imaging Sci Dent Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil Pais de publicación: Corea del Sur