Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing intravenous lidocaine and pethidine for pain management in emergency department patients with femoral bone fracture: a randomized controlled trial.
Eftekhar, Seyed Parsa; Hazrati, Ebrahim; Mosaed, Reza; Dini, Saeed Shiralizadeh; Galougahi, Mohammad Hassan Kazemi; Namazi, Mehrshad.
Afiliación
  • Eftekhar SP; Trauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Hazrati E; Trauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Mosaed R; Trauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Dini SS; Trauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Galougahi MHK; Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Namazi M; Trauma and Surgery Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. drmehrnamazi@gmail.com.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 250, 2024 Jul 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39044154
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Intravenous lidocaine has shown promise as an effective analgesic in various clinical settings, but its utility for pain management in emergency departments, especially for bone fractures, remains relatively understudied.

OBJECTIVE:

This study compared intravenous lidocaine to pethidine for femoral bone fracture pain management.

METHODS:

This double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in the emergency department of AJA University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals. Patients aged 18-70 years-old with femoral bone fracture and experiencing severe pain, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain ≥ 7, were included in the study. One group received intravenous pethidine (25 mg), while the other group received intravenous lidocaine (3 mg/kg, not exceeding 200 mg), infused with 250 ml saline over 20 min. Pain levels were evaluated before treatment administration (0 min) and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after treatment administration using the NRS.

RESULTS:

Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. Demographic characteristics and pain scores were similar between the two groups. The mean pain scores upon arrival for the lidocaine and pethidine groups were 8.50 ± 1 and 8.0 ± 1, respectively; after one hour, they were 4.0 ± 1 and 4.0 ± 1, respectively. While there was a statistically significant reduction in pain in both groups after one hour, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.262). Pethidine had a higher incidence of adverse events, though not statistically significant. Additionally, females required more rescue analgesics.

CONCLUSION:

The administration of intravenous lidocaine is beneficial for managing pain in femoral bone fractures, suggesting that lidocaine could be a potent alternative to opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION IRCT20231213060355N1 ( https//irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/74624 ) (30/12/2023).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Fracturas del Fémur / Manejo del Dolor / Analgésicos Opioides / Anestésicos Locales / Lidocaína / Meperidina Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital / Fracturas del Fémur / Manejo del Dolor / Analgésicos Opioides / Anestésicos Locales / Lidocaína / Meperidina Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irán