Comprehensive contact tracing during an outbreak of alpha-variant SARS-CoV-2 in a rural community reveals less viral genomic diversity and higher household secondary attack rates than expected.

ABSTRACT

Sequencing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) genomes throughout the COVID-19 pandemic has generated a wealth of data on viral evolution across populations, but only a few studies have so far explored SARS-CoV-2 evolution across large connected transmission networks. Here, we couple data from SARS-CoV-2 sequencing with contact tracing data from an outbreak with a single origin in a rural Norwegian community where samples from all exposed persons were collected prospectively. A total of 134 nasopharyngeal samples were positive by PCR. Among the 121 retrievable genomes, 81 were identical to the genome of the introductor, thus demonstrating that genomics beyond clustering genotypically similar viral genomes to confirm relatedness offers limited additional value to manual contact tracing. In the cases where mutations were discovered, five small genetic clusters were identified. We observed a household secondary attack rate of 77%, with 92% of household members infected among households with secondary transmission, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 introduction into large families is likely to affect all household members. IMPORTANCE In outbreak investigations, obtaining a full overview of infected individuals within a population is seldom achieved. We here present an example where a single introduction of B1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 within a rural community allowed for tracing of the virus from an introductor via dissemination through larger gatherings into households. The outbreak occurred before widespread vaccination, allowing for a "natural" outbreak development with community lockdown. We show through sequencing that the virus can infect up to five consecutive persons without gaining mutations, thereby showing that contact tracing seems more important than sequencing for local outbreak investigations in settings with few alternative introductory transmission pathways. We also show how larger households where a child introduced transmission appeared more likely to promote further spread of the virus compared to households with an adult as the primary introductor.