Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ENHANCE: Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Adjunctive Pimavanserin for Schizophrenia in Patients With an Inadequate Response to Antipsychotic Treatment.
Bugarski-Kirola, Dragana; Bitter, Istvan; Liu, I-Yuan; Abbs, Brandon; Stankovic, Srdjan.
Afiliación
  • Bugarski-Kirola D; Clinical Research, Acadia Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
  • Bitter I; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Liu IY; Biostatistics, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Abbs B; Clinical Research, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, USA.
  • Stankovic S; Clinical Research, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, USA.
Schizophr Bull Open ; 3(1): sgac006, 2022 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39144794
ABSTRACT
Inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment is common in patients with schizophrenia. This study evaluated pimavanserin, a 5-HT 2A receptor inverse agonist/antagonist, as adjunctive treatment in patients with inadequate response. This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, study conducted in North America and Europe. Adult outpatients with schizophrenia and inadequate response to current antipsychotic were enrolled. Inclusion criteria included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score ≥65 and ≤110 and retrospective antipsychotic treatment stability of 8 weeks. Pimavanserin 20 mg/day or placebo added to ongoing antipsychotic was tested in a flexible-dose paradigm with dose adjustments allowed during the first 3 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint, PANSS total score change from baseline to week 6, was not met, although improvement was greater with pimavanserin than placebo (LS mean difference -2.1, [95% CI -4.5, 0.4]; P = .094). As a hierarchical testing procedure was used, additional efficacy analyses were exploratory. Clear separation from placebo was observed with pimavanserin at week 6 for the PANSS Negative Symptoms subscale (LS mean difference -0.7, [95% CI -1.5, 0.0]) and Marder Negative Symptom Factor score (-0.9, [-1.7, -0.1]). Analysis of European sites (81.5% of patients) revealed a difference for pimavanserin versus placebo on PANSS total score (LS mean difference -3.1, [95% CI -5.8, -0.4]) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score (-0.2, [-0.4, -0.0]). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 39.9% with pimavanserin and 36.4% with placebo. Although statistical significance for the primary endpoint was not met, a trend toward improvement in negative symptoms was observed with pimavanserin, warranting further study.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Schizophr Bull Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Schizophr Bull Open Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos