Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The genetic architecture of repeated local adaptation to climate in distantly related plants.
Whiting, James R; Booker, Tom R; Rougeux, Clément; Lind, Brandon M; Singh, Pooja; Lu, Mengmeng; Huang, Kaichi; Whitlock, Michael C; Aitken, Sally N; Andrew, Rose L; Borevitz, Justin O; Bruhl, Jeremy J; Collins, Timothy L; Fischer, Martin C; Hodgins, Kathryn A; Holliday, Jason A; Ingvarsson, Pär K; Janes, Jasmine K; Khandaker, Momena; Koenig, Daniel; Kreiner, Julia M; Kremer, Antoine; Lascoux, Martin; Leroy, Thibault; Milesi, Pascal; Murray, Kevin D; Pyhäjärvi, Tanja; Rellstab, Christian; Rieseberg, Loren H; Roux, Fabrice; Stinchcombe, John R; Telford, Ian R H; Todesco, Marco; Tyrmi, Jaakko S; Wang, Baosheng; Weigel, Detlef; Willi, Yvonne; Wright, Stephen I; Zhou, Lecong; Yeaman, Sam.
Afiliación
  • Whiting JR; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jwhiting2315@gmail.com.
  • Booker TR; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
  • Rougeux C; Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Lind BM; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Singh P; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Lu M; Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Huang K; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Whitlock MC; Aquatic Ecology and Evolution, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Aitken SN; EAWAG, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
  • Andrew RL; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Borevitz JO; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
  • Bruhl JJ; Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Collins TL; Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada.
  • Fischer MC; Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Hodgins KA; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Holliday JA; Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Ingvarsson PK; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Janes JK; Department of Planning and Environment, Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Khandaker M; Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Queanbeyan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Koenig D; ETH Zurich: Institute of Integrative Biology (IBZ), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kreiner JM; School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kremer A; Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Lascoux M; Department of Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Leroy T; Biology Department, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Milesi P; Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Murray KD; Species Survival Commission, Orchid Specialist Group, IUCN North America, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Pyhäjärvi T; School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Rellstab C; Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
  • Rieseberg LH; Institute for Integrative Genome Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
  • Roux F; Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Stinchcombe JR; Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Telford IRH; UMR BIOGECO, INRAE, Université de Bordeaux; 69 Route d'Arcachon, Cestas, France.
  • Todesco M; Program in Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Tyrmi JS; GenPhySE, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, Castanet Tolosan, France.
  • Wang B; Program in Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology Centre and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Weigel D; Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Willi Y; Department of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Biology Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
  • Wright SI; Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Zhou L; Viikki Plant Science Centre, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Yeaman S; Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Nat Ecol Evol ; 2024 Aug 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39187610
ABSTRACT
Closely related species often use the same genes to adapt to similar environments. However, we know little about why such genes possess increased adaptive potential and whether this is conserved across deeper evolutionary lineages. Adaptation to climate presents a natural laboratory to test these ideas, as even distantly related species must contend with similar stresses. Here, we re-analyse genomic data from thousands of individuals from 25 plant species as diverged as lodgepole pine and Arabidopsis (~300 Myr). We test for genetic repeatability based on within-species associations between allele frequencies in genes and variation in 21 climate variables. Our results demonstrate significant statistical evidence for genetic repeatability across deep time that is not expected under randomness, identifying a suite of 108 gene families (orthogroups) and gene functions that repeatedly drive local adaptation to climate. This set includes many orthogroups with well-known functions in abiotic stress response. Using gene co-expression networks to quantify pleiotropy, we find that orthogroups with stronger evidence for repeatability exhibit greater network centrality and broader expression across tissues (higher pleiotropy), contrary to the 'cost of complexity' theory. These gene families may be important in helping wild and crop species cope with future climate change, representing important candidates for future study.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nat Ecol Evol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Nat Ecol Evol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá