Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of TALK© training for interprofessional clinical debriefing in Latin America.
Diaz-Navarro, Cristina; Armijo-Rivera, Soledad; Prudencio-Palomino, Carla; Velazco-González, José Gamaliel; Castro, Pedro; León-Castelao, Esther.
Afiliación
  • Diaz-Navarro C; Department of Perioperative Care, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
  • Armijo-Rivera S; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Simulation and Innovation Unit, Universidad San Sebastián, Providencia, Santiago, Chile. Electronic address: s.armijo@talkdebrief.org.
  • Prudencio-Palomino C; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Nursing Continuous Education, Hospital Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Velazco-González JG; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Castro P; Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain.
  • León-Castelao E; TALK© Foundation, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Clinical Simulation Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Arch Med Res ; 55(7): 103060, 2024 Sep 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39332151
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Healthcare systems must adapt iteratively in response to external and local challenges while keeping patients and staff safe. Clinical debriefing is a cost-effective contributor to safety culture, facilitating learning and team adaptations that lead to improved processes, patient outcomes, and staff resilience. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, an interest has emerged in adopting TALK© to guide clinical debriefing to promote safety, mutual support, and cultural change within healthcare teams in Latin American contexts.

AIMS:

To evaluate the quality and applicability of TALK© debriefing training in Latin American settings and the willingness to debrief after an educational intervention.

METHODS:

Retrospective and descriptive study, examining anonymous data collected over 18 months after completing a "TALK© Debriefing Course for Healthcare Professionals" face-to-face or online. Data collected included participant characteristics, course details, quality and applicability of the intervention, and willingness to debrief.

RESULTS:

Five hundred and forty-five participants were enrolled, most from Argentina and Mexico. The overall quality of the intervention scored 19.62/20 points, obtaining 4.86/5 points for applicability. There were no significant differences between virtual and face-to-face sessions. After the intervention, ≥93.76% of participants felt able to engage in clinical debriefing, and 97.06% reported willingness to debrief.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dissemination of multi-professional clinical debriefing training in Latin America is feasible and easily scalable. The quality of the educational intervention was rated excellent in both virtual and face-to-face settings, supporting the value of remote educational diffusion. Most participants in this study intervention felt prepared and willing to debrief following the intervention.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Med Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Arch Med Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido Pais de publicación: Estados Unidos